Secured Research | Equipment Finance Originator | Monitor | Monitor Suite | Converge | STRIPES Leadership
No Result
View All Result
ABF Journal
Forward for Specialty Finance
SUBSCRIBE
Lender & Services Directory
  • News
    • People
    • Economy
    • All News
  • Deals
  • Magazine
    • Magazine Issues
    • Nominations
  • Features
  • Recruiting
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • News
    • People
    • Economy
    • All News
  • Deals
  • Magazine
    • Magazine Issues
    • Nominations
  • Features
  • Recruiting
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
ABF Journal
No Result
View All Result
Home News

KBRA: PG&E Likely to Request PPA Rejection from Bankruptcy Court

byAmanda Koprowski
February 7, 2019
in News

Credit rating agency KBRA released a project finance report exploring how the bankruptcy of Pacific Gas & Electric will affect project financings and power purchase agreements (PPAs).

PG&E filed for bankruptcy protection on January 29 to protect the utility from liabilities resulting from the historic California wildfires. The company said its total liabilities are around $52 billion, which includes anticipated expenses from the wildfires.

The filing was expected as the utility announced on January 14 that Chapter 11 protection was the only remaining option that would allow it to maintain financial stability and continue to service its customers. However, the bankruptcy process is expected to be lengthy and there is uncertainty surrounding the fate of PG&E’s signed long-term PPAs which, according to a 2017 10K filing, was around $36.7 billion with various renewable energy projects.

KBRA believes that PG&E, as a debtor in bankruptcy, is likely to request the “rejection” of many of its PPAs. The standard for bankruptcy court approval of a contract rejection is whether the utility can demonstrate that the rejection is a product of sound business judgment. This is likely for those PPAs where the purchase price is higher than the current market rate.

In the event of a rejection, the seller’s recourse is limited to (1) asserting a claim for damages from the contractual breach, or (2) offering to renegotiate the terms of the PPA. Therefore, it is quite plausible that a significant portion of PG&E’s existing PPAs could be terminated entirely or renegotiated to a lower amount since most of these contracts are above market. There are, however, some factors that suggest this may not occur.

Previous Post

BofA to Agent $50MM DIP Funding for Fashion Brand Charlotte Russe

Next Post

Mining Company Orvana Closes $6.84MM Facility with BBVA, Others

Related Posts

Deal Announcements

Hilco Global Provides $65MM FILO Loan to a National Specialty Retailer

July 24, 2026
Advanced Power Closes $100M Corporate Credit Facility
News

White Oak Global Advisors to Launch New Senior-Secured Private Credit Strategy

July 24, 2026
Deal Announcements

ADTRAN Secures New Senior Secured Credit Facility with JPMorgan

July 23, 2026
Wingspire Capital Provides Over $500MM in Corporate Finance Commitments in H1/25
News

GA Group Acquires Family Law Litigation Support Practice Trampe Settles

July 23, 2026
News

Holland & Knight Adds Finance Partner David

July 23, 2026
Wingspire Capital Provides Over $500MM in Corporate Finance Commitments in H1/25
News

Peapack Private Appoints Carraturo as Senior Managing Director, Commercial Private Banker

July 23, 2026
Next Post

Mining Company Orvana Closes $6.84MM Facility with BBVA, Others

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Case for High Velocity Underwriting in Middle Market and SME Deals

The Case for High Velocity Underwriting in Middle Market and SME Deals

July 6, 2026

TMA Leading Edge Series with Adam Duso: Out-of-Court: A Path to Value Preservation

July 2, 2026

Inside Today’s DIP Financing Landscape: Seth Lieberman on the Issues Reshaping Chapter 11

July 24, 2026

When the Meter Replaces the Subscription: Why Recurring Revenue Due Diligence Has to Catch Up

July 11, 2026

About Us

For over 50 years, RAM Holdings’ brands have led the commercial finance industry in publishing, talent development, research and events. ABF Journal’s audience is comprised of as many as 18,000 specialty finance industry executives, private equity investors, investment bankers, advisors, service providers and more.

Our Brands

  • Secured Research
  • Equipment Finance Originator
  • Monitor
  • Monitor Suite
  • Converge
  • STRIPES Leadership

 

Learn More

  • Advertise
  • Magazine
  • Contact Us

Newsletter

Driving specialty finance forward for decades with insights, recognition and deals. Sign up now.

SUBSCRIBE >>

© 2025 RAM Group Holdings - A Leading Commercial Finance Publishing Group For Over 50 Years

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • People
    • Economy
    • All News
  • Deals
  • Features
  • Magazine
    • Magazine Issues
    • Nominations
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Provider Directory >>

© 2025 RAM Group Holdings - A Leading Commercial Finance Publishing Group For Over 50 Years