Year-End Resilience: ABL Activity Persists Amid Regulatory Recalibration and Private Credit Compression
The middle market lending ecosystem closed out 2025 with a notable contrast between steady deal activity in asset-based lending and increasingly compressed economics in the broader private credit market. The week ending December 21 brought several significant ABL transactions even as year-end analysis confirmed that supply/demand dynamics continue to pressure spreads across direct lending. Market participants are digesting the implications of the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s 2025 Annual Report, released earlier in December, which signals a meaningful shift toward regulatory recalibration and deregulation heading into 2026.
Federal Reserve Delivers Third Consecutive Rate Cut Amid Internal Divisions
The Federal Reserve’s December 10 decision to cut the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 3.50%-3.75% continued reverberating through middle market credit conditions during the week.¹ The decision marked the third consecutive reduction and brought total easing to 175 basis points since the cutting cycle began in September 2024. However, the move carried significant caution signals, with three dissenting votes—the most contested decision under Chair Powell’s tenure—highlighting divergent views on appropriate policy.²
The closely watched dot plot indicated just one additional cut projected for 2026 and another in 2027, suggesting the Fed sees its work as largely complete. Chair Powell emphasized that rates are now in the “high end of the range of neutral,” positioning the Committee to adopt a wait-and-see posture as economic data accumulates.³ For floating-rate borrowers in the middle market, the gradual descent in base rates provides modest relief to interest coverage ratios that have been under pressure since 2022, though SOFR-based loans remain significantly more expensive than pre-pandemic levels.
Asset-Based Lending Transactions Demonstrate Year-End Momentum
Several notable ABL transactions closed during the week, underscoring continued lender appetite for collateral-backed structures. Service Compression, a Fort Worth-based natural gas compression services provider, announced a $100 million upsizing of its ABL facility to $400 million, with the expanded facility closing on December 17 and led by J.P. Morgan.⁴ The transaction, backed by equity sponsors Warburg Pincus and Masked Rider Capital, reflects continued financing support for energy services companies with quality asset bases.
TAB Bank closed a $7 million ABL facility for Certified Flux Solutions on December 18, including a $2.5 million inventory subline and a $70,000 term loan.⁵ The Kentucky-based specialized manufacturer serves the secondary aluminum industry with custom flux blends. Earlier in December, TAB also extended a $15 million ABL facility to Gehr Industries, a California-based electrical wire and cable distributor.⁶ These transactions illustrate the continued role of regional ABL providers in supporting manufacturing and industrial distribution businesses.
Private Credit Spreads Compress as Supply/Demand Imbalance Persists
Year-end analysis from Oaktree Capital Management highlighted the persistent technical imbalance weighing on direct lending returns. Average spreads in middle-market deals have compressed to approximately 450-475 basis points over SOFR, only marginally above large-cap deal pricing, reflecting the volume of dry powder chasing limited high-quality opportunities.⁷ The firm noted that while M&A activity showed signs of positive momentum toward year-end, pricing could stabilize or marginally widen only if transaction volumes materially increase in 2026.
The compression has been most acute as larger sponsors increasingly opt for the broadly syndicated loan market: 63% of LBOs larger than $1 billion have been financed in the BSL market in 2025, compared to 51% the prior year.⁸ Meanwhile, lower base rates combined with tight spreads mean prospective risk-adjusted returns in sponsor-backed direct lending are lower than a year ago, requiring managers to exercise heightened discipline in deal selection.
Middle Market M&A Volume Hits Decade Low, But Valuation Gaps Narrow
Middle market M&A activity slumped to a decade low in 2025, with PwC projecting just 496 transactions in the segment—hindered by macroeconomic uncertainty, elevated financing costs, and persistent valuation gaps between buyers and sellers.⁹ However, market participants reported encouraging signs that the valuation gap is finally narrowing as sellers adjust expectations and buyers increasingly utilize earnouts, seller notes, and other creative structures to bridge pricing differences.
Through mid-December, U.S. deal volume totaled approximately 13,900 transactions compared to 15,940 during the same period in 2024, though aggregate deal value increased to roughly $2.4 trillion from $1.83 trillion—boosted by large strategic transactions rather than middle market activity.¹⁰ PE firms are increasingly looking to the middle market for opportunities, though the valuation adjustment process has been gradual.
FSOC Annual Report Signals Deregulatory Shift for 2026
The Financial Stability Oversight Council’s 2025 Annual Report, released December 11, marked a significant departure from prior years’ approach to financial stability oversight.¹¹ Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced an overhaul of the Council’s structure and priorities, directing FSOC to move away from broad vulnerability-focused assessments toward identifying regulatory and supervisory policies that may impede economic growth.
The Council identified four priority areas for 2026: strengthening Treasury market resilience, addressing evolving cyber risks, enhancing supervisory frameworks for depository institutions, and harnessing artificial intelligence to promote financial stability.¹² Notably, the report found that U.S. financial markets and institutions functioned effectively in 2025, including during periods of market volatility in April. The report’s emphasis on reducing regulatory burden and promoting economic growth suggests a more accommodative environment for alternative lenders and middle market finance providers heading into 2026.
SEC 2026 Examination Priorities Target Private Credit
The SEC Division of Examinations’ 2026 priorities, released in November, identified private credit and alternative investments with extended lock-up periods as key focus areas.¹³ The first examination priorities under Chairman Paul Atkins emphasized that examinations “should not be a ‘gotcha’ exercise” while maintaining focus on fiduciary compliance, valuation practices, and conflict-of-interest disclosures.
For private fund advisers, examiners will scrutinize advisers managing both private funds and separately managed accounts, with particular attention to potential favoritism in investment allocations and interfund transfers. The priorities also highlighted Regulation S-P compliance, with larger entities having faced a December 3, 2025 deadline and smaller firms facing a June 2026 deadline for implementing enhanced data protection and incident response requirements.¹⁴
Items to Consider
Evaluate Spread Compression Implications. With middle-market spreads compressed to 450-475 basis points over SOFR, market participants should carefully assess whether risk-adjusted returns justify continued deployment or whether selectivity should increase. The supply/demand technical may persist until M&A volumes materially recover.
Prepare for Regulatory Recalibration. The FSOC’s shift toward economic growth promotion and burden reduction signals potential changes in supervisory expectations. Middle market lenders should monitor developments at member agencies for opportunities to streamline compliance while maintaining sound risk management.
Leverage Narrowing Valuation Gaps. As buyer and seller expectations converge, middle market participants may find year-end or early Q1 2026 opportune for revisiting stalled transactions. Creative structures including earnouts and seller financing can help bridge remaining gaps.
Audit SEC Examination Readiness. Private credit managers should review disclosure practices regarding illiquid assets, fee-related conflicts, and valuation methodologies ahead of the anticipated 2026 examination sweep targeting alternative investments.
Conclusion
The week ending December 21, 2025, encapsulated a middle market that is operationally resilient yet facing structural headwinds from spread compression and muted M&A activity. ABL providers continued closing transactions across manufacturing, energy services, and industrial distribution—demonstrating the enduring value of collateral-backed structures. Meanwhile, the regulatory environment appears poised for meaningful recalibration, with FSOC prioritizing economic growth and burden reduction while the SEC maintains targeted oversight of the expanding private credit sector. As 2026 approaches, the ability to navigate compressed economics while maintaining disciplined underwriting will distinguish successful market participants from those chasing yield at the expense of credit quality.
Footnotes
- Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement – Federal Reserve Board
- Fed interest rate decision December 2025 – CNBC
- Fed meeting December 2025 – Fidelity
- Service Compression Announces $400 Million ABL Facility Upsize – PR Newswire
- TAB Bank Secures $7 Million ABL Facility for Certified Flux Solutions – GlobeNewswire
- TAB Bank Extends $15 Million ABL Facility to Gehr Industries – GlobeNewswire
- The Roundup: Top Takeaways from Oaktree’s Quarterly Letters – December 2025 Edition – Oaktree Capital
- The Roundup: Top Takeaways from Oaktree’s Quarterly Letters – December 2025 Edition – Oaktree Capital
- AI megadeals, IPO green shoots, and a middle-market squeeze: The new M&A reality for CFOs – Fortune
- Wall Street deals 2025 under Trump: Tariffs, uncertainty slow M&A – CNBC
- FSOC 2025 Annual Report – U.S. Department of the Treasury
- A Change in Course: FSOC’s 2025 Annual Report Signals Deregulation – Lexology
- SEC Announces 2026 Exam Priorities – Akin Gump
- December 3, 2025 Deadline Approaching for Regulation S-P Compliance – Foley Hoag LLP







